John Greathouse posted in the Wall Street Journal that women should hide their gender to advance in tech, akin to putting women in a virtual burka.
John Greathouse posted on the Wall Street Journal that women should mask their gender to advance in tech. By using initials, removing photos and references to gender, his advice encourages nothing less than shrouding women in a virtual burka.
How were the insights of Greathouse, a tenured professor at the University of California Santa Barbara and a venture capital partner, received? He tweeted an apology “for the dreadful article” after being schooled on the errors of his premise by women and men across the internet. There hasn’t been apology in the WSJ. Another question is how did the editors let the fraught post slip through. No doubt the inevitable rebuttals that generate traffic were part of the decision.
In response, techies Jessica Rose and Holly Brockwell gave Greathouse some advice on Gadgette:
"This isn’t a new idea for us"
"There’s value in professional visibility"
"Disconnecting our personas from ourselves has temporary effects"
"Shifting responsibility for managing sexism to women is bullshit"
"Once you recognise that these biases exist within the industry, it becomes your responsibility to work to minimise and combat them. As a VC, you have an incredible amount of power and influence in the way our industry hires, rewards and values talent. You could use it to promote processes that combat biases in our industry. You could focus on investing in projects that appropriately recruit and reward underrepresented talent. You could have written an article for the Wall Street Journal on the value of blind hiring processes, placing the responsibility on those who hold the power in technology. But you didn’t do any of that. You put the responsibility for managing gendered biases on the women that you recognise as undervalued in our industry.We don’t have time for that, John. We’re already doing twice as much work, for half the recognition."
Related Story: Alt-Feminist Gems From the Wall Street Journal: Did John Greathouse Really Say That?
The Twitterati’s reaction to Greathouse’s theories:
#WSJ #JohnGreathouse "If you wanna get ahead in business, better hide them lady parts!" #slowclap #facepalm
— K-Town (@KLDVComedy) September 29, 2016
Nice to see you've reconsidered your argument. I hope for an explanation from @WSJ editorial. https://t.co/9vmRKCTMmG
— Kate Kaye on BlueSky at katekaye.bsky.s (@KateKayeReports) September 29, 2016
Why #womenintech are outraged https://t.co/WB1mfi65jY #tech #women #gendergap #genderequality #JohnGreathouse
— YC Williams (@MistressPrime) September 30, 2016
Well, @johngreathouse @WSJ Good thing I am camouflaged by a helmet and firesuit ! I guess that fooled them all ! @GMA #womeninbusiness pic.twitter.com/o4FCefvzTc
— Dina Parise (@DPariseRacing) September 30, 2016
.@johngreathouse Looking forward to your follow up piece helping men acknowledge and avoid bias in next week's @WSJ
— Kristy Morrison (@kristy) September 29, 2016
This is the first I’ve heard of @johngreathouse. Makes me wonder if he’s really an expert on “curating [ones] online first impression”.
— Peter Seibel (@peterseibel) September 29, 2016
"I hurt women and I utterly failed to help, which I wholly regret and I apologize for having done.” -#JohnGreathouse https://t.co/Auh7H55MCS
— SOF: Social Good (@SOFsocialgood) September 30, 2016
.@johngreathouse @WSJ you are effectively telling all women, including impressionable young girls, to be ashamed of their gender online.
— Lom 🌱 (@lomadia) September 29, 2016
#outraged by #JohnGreathouse article in #WSJ that women should obscure their gender to get ahead. #boo #deadwrong https://t.co/bOzrL9IBMt
— Megan Dahlgren (@dahlgrenm) September 30, 2016
SCREW THAT. I spent 1990 to 1997 using a man's name on the internet. It's time for those jackasses to grow up, @johngreathouse. https://t.co/VFHyKlhJYG
— Maria Alexander⚔️ (@LaMaupin) September 29, 2016
#johngreathouse translated for non-middle school boys. #genderdiversity #EndHypocrisy https://t.co/BPtjtIC5tF
— 𝕃𝕠𝕔𝕦𝕥𝕦𝕤 𝕠𝕗 𝔹𝕠𝕣𝕘™ (@WildPalmsLtd) September 29, 2016
What remains to be seen is whether or not Greathouse has the chops to weigh in on how to accept and advance women in technology. Here’s hoping.