There’s something truly heartwarming about the Paddington movie franchise centering around the iconic British bear dressed in his signature blue duffle coat and red bucket hat. Our fluffy friend has been part of pop culture for over sixty years, since first appearing in Michael Bond’s 1958 children’s book A Bear Called Paddington.
It comes as no surprise that the adorable bear remains an icon all these years later. He’s such a kind, well-mannered, and thoughtful being, which is the reason these movies are cherished by many. The films in the Paddington franchise are ones you tend to watch after a long, hard day at work. They’re a comforting escape from reality that will lift your spirits. Though, above all else, they’re mindless, lovable fun for just under two hours.
In the third installment of the franchise, Paddington in Peru, Paddington (Ben Whishaw) travels to South America with his family after receiving a concerning letter from The Reverend Mother (played by Olivia Colman) of The Home for Retired Bears, which is where Paddington’s Aunt Lucy lives. In the Reverend Mother’s correspondence with Paddington, she voices concern about Aunt Lucy’s recent behavior, which she puts down to her missing Paddington. Of course, this news makes Paddington incredibly concerned, which results in him heading to Peru with his family to visit her.
Paddington in Peru is the first film in the franchise where almost all the story takes place away from the two previous films’ notable London setting, which is part of what made them so great in the first place. At first, the change of location seems an exciting and promising new concept, and there are still moments of humor and uplifting themes (such as the importance of family and loyalty). However, the shift to Peru and the world-building surrounding the adventure slightly overshadows Paddington as a character and doesn’t quite capture the magic of the two previous films. This leaves little room to focus on the hilarious mishaps we often see Paddington experience in his everyday interactions with humans in London.
The absence of Paul King and Sally Hawkins is also impossible to ignore. The latter is particularly prevalent when the story attempts to reflect emotional family moments that don’t pack much of a punch due to the notable character replacement. However, given the circumstances, Emily Mortimer embraces her role and gives a decent performance.
Mortimer is in great company, as the acting is what keeps Paddington in Peru from being forgettable. As always, Whishaw brings immense charm to his role as the lovable bear. I couldn’t imagine any other actor who could effortlessly capture Paddington’s endearing naivety and gentle nature quite like he does. Though these moments are sparse, they periodically shine through, and we as the audience are reminded why this bear is such a popular, timeless figure. Colman can do no wrong and gives a comical, larger-than-life performance and is without a doubt the best part of the film. If you find the rest of the movie slightly underwhelming, her singing sequence more than makes up for it.
Though Paddington in Peru doesn’t compare to its predecessors, there are still some standout elements that prevent it from seeping into unmemorable territory. As the movie focuses on the adventure of traveling to South America, the film excels most with its visual storytelling, which seamlessly places the family in the jungle, showcasing captivating, vibrant colors that are aesthetically engaging.
Paddington’s endearing qualities take a backseat to the film’s adventure narrative, and a good portion of the emotional resonance found in the two previous films is lost here. However, there are still great performances, and the stunning visuals are just enough to keep you immersed in the experience.
3/5